Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Spotify, YouTube, and Apple use algorithms to feed you music. You may make them higher.


Final summer season, I give up Spotify, and wrote about it with the moderately unsubtle headline “Why I give up Spotify.” My causes stay sound: The software program had grow to be clunky, the adverts relentless, and the Sabrina Carpenter songs too inescapable. I needed to discover a higher music streaming service. It provides me no pleasure to report that a couple of weeks in the past, I rejoined.

The algorithm obtained me. I don’t simply imply that it obtained me, the best way the TikTok algorithm glues you to the display. Spotify’s algorithm obtained me the best way an outdated pal will get me and my bizarre affection for yacht rock or ongoing obsession with French contact music from the mid-Aughts. It took a couple of months of digging by way of the proverbial crates of Apple Music for me to understand that Spotify has one thing different streaming companies might by no means get: 15 years of my music listening habits and artificially clever software program to strengthen these habits.

For this reason algorithms are usually considered as villains nowadays. They’re the know-how behind TikTok’s For You web page, which retains feeding you bizarre movies you possibly can’t cease watching, and Amazon suggestions that seem to know what prescription you’re taking. Fb’s algorithms, in the meantime, have been radicalizing People for at the very least a decade, and Instagram’s algorithmic feed is wrecking the psychological well being of a whole era. The implications of Spotify’s algorithms, you may argue, are quaint by comparability.

Spotify’s algorithm obtained me the best way an outdated pal will get me and my bizarre affection for yacht rock.

Quitting and unquitting Spotify made me understand one thing, although. As central as algorithmic feeds are to the way you devour info, you’ve extra management over how these algorithms form your tastes and conduct than you may assume.

If an algorithm works for you — as Spotify’s does for me — don’t really feel unhealthy about submitting to its easy and handy choices.

Music has at all times been vital to me, and over time, it began to really feel like I needed to gamify Spotify to search out songs that I actually beloved. When Spotify launched in 2011, it was principally a large library of all of the music, however over time, it launched increasingly algorithmic suggestions and playlists that promised to match my style. It nonetheless took work to search out the good things.

This work is what has now made Spotify’s algorithms irreplaceable to me. It has a decade-and-a-half of my listening historical past, and over time, I’ve discovered its quirks and tinkered with it to fulfill my wants. I spent months making an attempt to duplicate this expertise on Apple Music, however its algorithms struggled to shock me.

All music streaming algorithms function on two primary ideas: content-based filtering and collaborative filtering. The content-based filtering tries to establish particular elements of a music itself, together with the artist, style, temper, and so forth, to queue up the subsequent music. Collaborative filtering refers to suggestions made primarily based on different individuals who take heed to a sure music and what else they take heed to. If two folks take heed to the identical 5 songs, there’s a superb probability they’ll each like this sixth music. It’s all math, and typically there are anomalies that can delight you.

“Among the serendipity that you simply get is form of error was advantage,” Glenn McDonald, a former knowledge alchemist at Spotify and creator of Each Noise at As soon as, instructed me. “So that you’re shocked, and typically these surprises are nice.”

It’s not simply that Spotify’s suggestions are usually nice as a result of it has loads of knowledge about me. It’s that Spotify has the listening historical past of 675 million folks, whose pursuits could overlap with mine in numerous other ways. Over time, I’ve developed a set of habits that assist me hone these suggestions — issues like making playlists, rejecting suggestions I don’t like, exploring artists’ catalogs, and perhaps most significantly, digging by way of different folks’s playlists.

That is what I name lean-forward listening. Whereas it’s simple sufficient to click on on Uncover Weekly each Monday, lean again and take heed to the entire thing like a radio present, after which transfer on to the subsequent playlist, the extra effort you place into curating your expertise, the higher the algorithms will work subsequent time. On the very least, you’ll discover your approach onto a playlist that algorithms didn’t create.

How to withstand algorithmic rule

Like them or not, algorithmic suggestions aren’t going wherever. Corporations like Spotify like them as a result of — once they work — algorithms maintain folks hooked on their merchandise. Corporations like Amazon like them as a result of algorithmic suggestions allow them to steer folks’s conduct. The suitable product suggestion may lead somebody to purchase one thing they didn’t in any other case plan on shopping for. (We’ve all performed it.)

This established order appears dystopian in loads of methods. Algorithmic suggestions had been all the fad a few a long time in the past, when personalization felt handy moderately than creepy. Netflix deserves loads of credit score for this, because it pioneered the idea of providing you with custom-made film suggestions within the late Nineties. However by the early 2010s, it was getting laborious to inform the distinction between personalised suggestions and focused adverts. Now, virtually all the things you see on-line is personalised to a level, from the entrance web page of the New York Occasions to the listing of eating places in your favourite meals supply app.

You’ll be able to most likely be taught to reside with it while you’re speaking about music on Spotify or burrito eating places on DoorDash. “The stakes are slightly bit larger in the case of recommending issues like merchandise on Amazon, and even larger in the case of recommending issues like content material on Fb,” stated Meredith Broussard, a knowledge journalism professor at New York College. “As a result of, as everyone knows, disinformation and misinformation are very, very fashionable, however not good.”

The function algorithms, that are designed to spice up engagement, play in spreading misinformation is a book-length matter. For now, I’ll simply reiterate that you simply don’t need to lean again and let Fb, Google, or X flood you with algorithmically generated info. You’ll be able to be taught extra about how these platforms use algorithms and steer them to your benefit.

When you’re sick of the algorithm on X feeding you right-wing propaganda, strive Bluesky, which helps you to choose completely different algorithms to your feed. And if Netflix or another streaming service has gotten stale, strive nuking your view historical past and beginning over. Spotify presents a listing of particulars about the way it recommends content material and how one can make tweaks. And Amazon has a device that’s designed to enhance your suggestions. (I’ve tried all of these items, together with the Amazon device, which could be very tedious however nonetheless probably useful.)

Issues get slightly harder on massive platforms like Google, Fb, Instagram, and TikTok, whose algorithms have a tendency towards the black field finish of the spectrum. Nonetheless, understanding how algorithms work and taking part in an lively function in making them work higher for you possibly can enhance your expertise on virtually any platform. Algorithms are solely in cost when you allow them to be.

In some instances, you may prefer it when the algorithm’s in cost. That is how I typically really feel on Spotify, though I’m consistently correcting it and guiding it. That is additionally how I typically really feel on Amazon, the place I attempt to purchase solely the fundamentals. I give up Instagram some time in the past once I determined the algorithm was in cost slightly an excessive amount of. If I get bored sooner or later, I would strive it once more.

A model of this story was additionally printed within the Person Pleasant publication. Enroll right here so that you don’t miss the subsequent one!

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles