Be a part of our every day and weekly newsletters for the newest updates and unique content material on industry-leading AI protection. Study Extra
Enterprises have to know if the fashions that energy their functions and brokers work in real-life eventualities. This sort of analysis can typically be complicated as a result of it’s exhausting to foretell particular eventualities. A revamped model of the RewardBench benchmark appears to be like to offer organizations a greater concept of a mannequin’s real-life efficiency.
The Allen Institute of AI (Ai2) launched RewardBench 2, an up to date model of its reward mannequin benchmark, RewardBench, which they declare gives a extra holistic view of mannequin efficiency and assesses how fashions align with an enterprise’s objectives and requirements.
Ai2 constructed RewardBench with classification duties that measure correlations by means of inference-time compute and downstream coaching. RewardBench primarily offers with reward fashions (RM), which may act as judges and consider LLM outputs. RMs assign a rating or a “reward” that guides reinforcement studying with human suggestions (RHLF).
Nathan Lambert, a senior analysis scientist at Ai2, informed VentureBeat that the primary RewardBench labored as meant when it was launched. Nonetheless, the mannequin setting quickly developed, and so ought to its benchmarks.
“As reward fashions turned extra superior and use instances extra nuanced, we rapidly acknowledged with the neighborhood that the primary model didn’t totally seize the complexity of real-world human preferences,” he stated.
Lambert added that with RewardBench 2, “we got down to enhance each the breadth and depth of analysis—incorporating extra numerous, difficult prompts and refining the methodology to replicate higher how people really decide AI outputs in follow.” He stated the second model makes use of unseen human prompts, has a tougher scoring setup and new domains.
Utilizing evaluations for fashions that consider
Whereas reward fashions check how properly fashions work, it’s additionally necessary that RMs align with firm values; in any other case, the fine-tuning and reinforcement studying course of can reinforce dangerous conduct, akin to hallucinations, cut back generalization, and rating dangerous responses too excessive.
RewardBench 2 covers six completely different domains: factuality, exact instruction following, math, security, focus and ties.
“Enterprises ought to use RewardBench 2 in two alternative ways relying on their utility. In the event that they’re performing RLHF themselves, they need to undertake the most effective practices and datasets from main fashions in their very own pipelines as a result of reward fashions want on-policy coaching recipes (i.e. reward fashions that mirror the mannequin they’re attempting to coach with RL). For inference time scaling or information filtering, RewardBench 2 has proven that they’ll choose the most effective mannequin for his or her area and see correlated efficiency,” Lambert stated.
Lambert famous that benchmarks like RewardBench provide customers a strategy to consider the fashions they’re selecting based mostly on the “dimensions that matter most to them, reasonably than counting on a slender one-size-fits-all rating.” He stated the thought of efficiency, which many analysis strategies declare to evaluate, may be very subjective as a result of a very good response from a mannequin extremely will depend on the context and objectives of the person. On the identical time, human preferences get very nuanced.
Ai 2 launched the primary model of RewardBench in March 2024. On the time, the corporate stated it was the primary benchmark and leaderboard for reward fashions. Since then, a number of strategies for benchmarking and enhancing RM have emerged. Researchers at Meta’s FAIR got here out with reWordBench. DeepSeek launched a new method known as Self-Principled Critique Tuning for smarter and scalable RM.
How fashions carried out
Since RewardBench 2 is an up to date model of RewardBench, Ai2 examined each present and newly educated fashions to see in the event that they proceed to rank excessive. These included a wide range of fashions, akin to variations of Gemini, Claude, GPT-4.1, and Llama-3.1, together with datasets and fashions like Qwen, Skywork, and its personal Tulu.
The corporate discovered that bigger reward fashions carry out finest on the benchmark as a result of their base fashions are stronger. Total, the strongest-performing fashions are variants of Llama-3.1 Instruct. When it comes to focus and security, Skywork information “is especially useful,” and Tulu did properly on factuality.
Ai2 stated that whereas they consider RewardBench 2 “is a step ahead in broad, multi-domain accuracy-based analysis” for reward fashions, they cautioned that mannequin analysis ought to be primarily used as a information to select fashions that work finest with an enterprise’s wants.
