Regardless of which approach you take a look at it, the “Star Wars” franchise has modified dramatically over the last 10 years, shifting from a sequence based totally round cinematic occasions to a primarily streaming-only tv enterprise. Whereas Disney and Lucasfilm are placing “Star Wars” again into the cinema with the upcoming “Starfighter” and “The Mandalorian and Grogu,” the previous continues to be an unknown amount, whereas the latter feels much less like an occasion and extra like a big-screen model of a small-screen present. Sadly, that is just about what we’ve got to work with, seeing as how the franchise has gone by way of an incredibly giant variety of false begins and near-misses to finish up at these two future options.
A type of near-misses has simply been revealed because of Adam Driver’s interview with AP Information, and it is a doozy. Based on the actor, who portrayed Kylo Ren née Ben Solo within the Sequel Trilogy, he and Lucasfilm had been engaged on a solo movie entitled “The Hunt for Ben Solo,” and the director that they had lined up was none aside from Academy Award Winner Steven Soderbergh. Reasonably than merely an idle pitch or kernel of an thought, it appears that evidently Soderbergh and Driver not solely had a accomplished script in hand but additionally the approval of Lucasfilm brass, together with Kathleen Kennedy. Nonetheless, once they introduced the mission to Disney CEO Bob Iger and co-chairman Alan Bergman, the executives turned down the concept outright for no higher motive than “they did not see how Ben Solo was alive,” as Driver defined. That is, to place it mildly, a bizarrely pedantic motive to cancel what probably would’ve been an enchanting, presumably even nice new “Star Wars” movie, and is a reasonably good indication of why the franchise, because it stands, feels so creatively stagnant.
Driver and Soderbergh’s Ben Solo film had an thrilling group hooked up
It is simple to know the sense of apathy many of us have about franchises as of late, because it looks like most new installments exist extra for the assured paychecks than any artistic ardour. But this was not the case with Driver:
“I at all times was thinking about doing one other ‘Star Wars.’ I had been speaking about doing one other one since 2021. […] I at all times stated: With an amazing director and an amazing story, I would be there in a second. I cherished that character and cherished enjoying him.”
Based on Driver, he took his idea for the movie to Soderbergh (whom he labored with in “Logan Fortunate”), who then outlined a narrative with Rebecca Blunt (a pseudonym which probably belongs to Soderbergh’s spouse, Jules Asner) earlier than handing script duties to collaborator Scott Z. Burns. The consequence was invigorating, as Driver recalled:
“[It was] one of many coolest (expletive) scripts I had ever been part of. We offered the script to Lucasfilm. They cherished the concept. They completely understood our angle and why we have been doing it. We took it to Bob Iger and Alan Bergman and so they stated no. […] And that was that.”
In an announcement given to AP Information, Soderbergh echoed Driver’s sentiments with a heavy dose of remorse:
“I actually loved making the film in my head. I am simply sorry the followers will not get to see it.”
It is a disgrace that the movie did not occur, particularly when Soderbergh has been on a scorching streak lately, as his movies “Kimi,” “Presence,” and “Black Bag” have been praised for being exceptionally intelligent style movies. Had the director been let free on “Star Wars,” we could have had the primary really daring entry within the sequence since “The Final Jedi.”
The dying of the Ben Solo film is one more occasion of the problems with kowtowing to terrible followers
Divorced from the information of the final a number of years of “Star Wars” discourse, there are numerous cases of supposedly lifeless characters coming again to life inside “Star Wars” itself (Ben Kenobi’s Drive Ghost, as an illustration). Sadly, one in all probably the most controversial examples is of Emperor Palpatine’s return in “The Rise of Skywalker.” Criticisms of Palpatine’s return have largely revolved across the idea’s ham-fisted approach of attempting to tie all three “Star Wars” trilogies collectively inside a single concluding chapter. But, because of the way in which discourse operates on social media — i.e., it turns into lowered to a single meme — it could possibly be interpreted that almost all followers’ challenge with the resurrection of the character is that he was resurrected in any respect.
In different phrases, it is solely probably that Iger and Bergman have been petrified of one other “By some means, Palpatine returned” meme catching hearth in the event that they introduced the apparently lifeless Ben Solo again for a post-“Rise of Skywalker” movie. In that case, then that is one more occasion of the “Star Wars” franchise meekly catering to the complaints of the loudest and most obnoxious followers, as seen within the case of “The Acolyte” and even “The Rise of Skywalker” itself. This, plus the lengthy listing of cancelled initiatives with huge filmmakers, has turned “Star Wars” right into a depressingly risk-averse universe, with initiatives like “Andor” changing into the exception and never the norm. It is ironic, contemplating that George Lucas’ authentic 1977 movie was one of many largest dangers in cinema historical past. Although it is comprehensible why firm homeowners would not need to rock any boats, these in command of the galaxy far, distant would do effectively to be much less involved with pleasing a few of the individuals all the time.
