What, precisely, does a Director of Cognitive Benefit do? It’s not a title most Individuals encounter, and it sits far outdoors the acquainted contours of diplomacy, navy drive, or financial leverage. However as Chenoweth explains, the competition for affect now not stays neatly inside these lanes both.
His focus is commonly on the grey house – the place info, notion, tradition, and conduct collide, and the place adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are working with staggering sources and strategic focus.
On this Cipher Transient dialog, Chenoweth breaks down how cognitive operations truly work, why the U.S. has struggled to maintain tempo, and what it means to present the President an “info possibility” that’s not merely kinetic or financial.
He gives uncommon, candid perception into how know-how, AI, and social platforms—from TikTok to algorithmically pushed personas—are reshaping the battlespace sooner than policymakers can write doctrine.
Our dialog is a deep dive into one of many least understood – however maybe most consequential – fronts of recent nationwide safety. Our dialog has been frivolously edited for size and readability.
Shawn Chenoweth
Shawn Chenoweth is the Director of Cognitive Benefit on the US Nationwide Safety Council.
The Cipher Transient: How do you clarify the function of the director of Cognitive Benefit?
Chenoweth: While you take a look at conventional components of navy energy, you most likely consider the DIME assemble. It is not an ideal assemble, but it surely’s fairly good. DIME, is damaged down into Diplomatic, Info, Navy and Financial, and it is very clear who owns the Diplomatic, Navy, and Financial parts. However there hasn’t been, not less than in a number of many years, a great instance of the place folks have actually come to the president and the administration with an “I” possibility, for Info. And it is a disgrace as a result of while you truly take a look at the DIME assemble, you do not wish to break it into range pipes. We should always consider it as a cell. Every of these components acts as a part of a functioning cell, and eradicating any of these components means you will have an imperfect or failing cell.
So, I used to be requested to assist put the “I” again in DIME in order that we are able to present further choices and benefits throughout the opposite components of DIME to nationwide energy and supply the president with alternatives to perform the Administration’s goals that are not simply warheads on foreheads or threatening economics or expending political leverage. We will improve these issues, however we are able to additionally achieve benefits through the use of cognitive results by means of the data setting.
Kelly: Let’s set the stage a bit additional. When you have been to clarify to the typical American what is going on when it comes to cognitive warfare within the grey zone – the realm the place battle happens under the extent of warfare – how would you describe it?
Chenoweth: I believe for those who look by means of your navy histories, philosophers, politicians, political science, it is all fairly clear. You may select the weather. All of them have one underlying thread, which is that political victory is the one which issues at its core. That is actually what we’re speaking about. Nothing’s modified. How human beings are linked, how know-how is affected has definitely modified. However what we actually care about is what folks do in the actual world and the geophysical world, the world we reside in.
So, the purpose of a cognitive benefit is to leverage that in order that human beings are taking behaviors favorable to outcomes, to nationwide goals, which more often than not are additionally – within the case of the US – favorable in their very own proper. So it is core. And that’s what we’re driving to get: these benefits in what folks do in the actual world by means of their sensing, to make choices that come again to the actual world and have the results that you really want.
Kelly: Are you able to give an instance of what that might appear like?
Chenoweth: As an instance you are negotiating for a bit of land or a base that you simply want for overflight intel assortment. You are going to conduct a trade-off in negotiations. Possibly it’ll appear like, – for those who pay extra, you will get extra – primarily based off what the worth proposition is. However very hardly ever is it that blatant and easy. So, what you need to have the ability to do is perceive, what benefit would we want within the negotiation? What’s truly driving this different occasion aside from perhaps simply value or simply hazard? What’s the danger calculus?
There are cultural nuances that have an effect on issues: their understanding of affect, political implications. So, the purpose could be to grasp why they’d have an interest on this within the first place? What benefit does it give them? What are the cultural nuances? Why would not they do that within the first place? Why aren’t they taking this motion and what can we do to ensure that the end result is what we wish?
There are different areas the place that applies throughout the spectrum.
As an instance we’re conducting counter-terrorism operations, and we all know an goal tends to make use of a specific cafe. Properly, what in the event that they have been utilizing a distinct one which day? What can we do to affect them to go to a spot that is extra favorable for choices to lower our personal danger calculus, both as a result of we wish to conduct a kinetic strike or make an arrest? Possibly we won’t discover them. So, what if we use that for our intel assortment and our strategies to mainly make them come up on comms and alter their conduct so it is simpler to seek out them, accumulate on them, and construct the info in order that we are able to conduct bodily actions to cease or disrupt them? And you’ll type of see how that applies throughout the board.
If you already know greater than the individual you are coping with, chances are high that you’ll be higher at undertaking your end result. It’s very related with the werewolf concept. It is a sport the place two individuals are chosen to be the werewolf of the village and everybody else within the group would not know who the werewolf is. More often than not the people who find themselves the werewolves win the sport as a result of they’ve an info benefit over everybody else taking part in the sport. So, it is a human norm.
And once more, I level out that nothing’s new below the solar. It is simply that we have not actually thought by means of the implications of what it means within the info age that we reside in – the place everyone seems to be linked by means of software program outlined radios. We’re a good distance away from direct sensing the place it is communication and issues occurring in the actual world. Now we’ve type of oblique sensing the place you are fed information feeds and the whole lot else. We will have an effect on cognitive conduct in methods we by no means imagined, and we actually have not thought by means of simply as we are able to attain folks and promote objects. And if I wish to discover an individual whose favourite coloration is purple, who’s a navy age male who’s actually into Magnum PI, I can discover that individual because of their radio, and I can craft messages particularly for somebody who matches that demographic and transfer them in a specific route. That is the primary time in historical past that that is been the case.
Kelly: You will have a background that mixes each authorities and personal sector expertise. On condition that know-how is being quickly developed within the non-public sector, how do you suppose that background offers you a bonus on this function?
Chenoweth: There are lots of people who’ve served within the navy and have been contractors however simply by happenstance, I occur to have been in plenty of vital areas at vital instances. I believe one of many benefits that has introduced me is that I noticed the frustration inside the navy when the contracting equipment did not work. I used to be additionally empowered by business to go and repair plenty of these buildings and allow the federal government to do it, and now I am getting afforded the chance to work on coverage to make the system actually hum.
I believe the benefit with that’s that on the subject of the data house, there is no management. And I attempt to emphasize this to any coverage maker or energy dealer or resolution maker that I can discover. You may put an armored brigade in an intersection – totally outfitted, totally supported – and a U.S. Armored Brigade might personal that intersection. There are issues you may management. However on the subject of the data house, there isn’t any management. It’s consistently shifting, consistently altering. You will have a binary resolution. You’re both going to take part, ideally at a degree that issues, or not, and no matter’s going to occur goes to occur.
So, you could possibly end up in an advantageous info house within the morning, lose it by the late morning, get a stalemate within the afternoon, and win it again within the afternoon – simply to lose it once more on the finish of the day. And while you get up the subsequent morning, you are going to must do it yet again. There is no such thing as a, “We now have info dominance and we’re finished and we are able to crack our beers and go on with different issues.”
That is not how this works as a result of on daily basis new info is being injected into the system. Persons are altering and growing new opinions. Issues are occurring and individuals are going to react to these issues, change their opinions, adapt, age out, age in, so these cultural references might change. It is a fixed flux. One of many issues that from the U.S. authorities facet we’re getting our head round is that we want an info provider group consistently working afloat within the info setting, successfully. One which’s engaged 24/7 to have an effect on these modifications.
The Cipher Transient is partnering with the Info Professionals Affiliation and the Nationwide Middle for Narrative Intelligence to deliver you Pinnacle 2026: Grey Zone Convergence: Cognitive Safety on the Intersection of Affect, Innovation, and Shared Pursuits. Register for the February 9-10 convention now to safe your spot.
Kelly: It is not simply the US that has gotten fairly good at understanding the affect of cognitive benefit. We see these techniques from China and Russia getting used with beautiful success. On this function, how centered are you on their actions on the subject of doing the very same factor that you simply’re tasked with doing?
Chenoweth: They completely apply these actions. I name them the ‘CRINKETT’. Each problem we’re usually coping with falls within the CRINKETTS. It is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Terrorists and Trans[national] criminals. And notably for the nation states, that is precisely how they wish to compete.
From their perspective, there are two methods to take care of the US: asymmetrically and stupidly, largely due to our financial and navy energy. They get that. They are not involved in a kinetic battle; that’s an terrible prospect. So the way in which they wish to do that is in grey zone actions, within the info house, within the cognitive area.
They usually outspend us. I am not going to say essentially outperform, however I will say if you wish to compete at a degree that issues, they outspend us, interval. Iran most likely spends round $1.8 billion plus-minus a 12 months, perhaps extra with their proxies and the whole lot else they do on this specific house. Russia – put up Ukraine invasion, spends about $2.6 billion, one thing like that. China – 48 plus billion {dollars} a 12 months. The U.S., if I take the entire actions from the DoD, the State Division and the whole lot else, and you place these collectively, you may method $1.2 billion.
It doesn’t suggest we’re executing these funds both. It simply signifies that that is what we have allotted. When you concentrate on how we outspend to have a bonus on the opposite elements of DIME, we’re hideously underperforming right here. And once more, all props to the administration. They’re aware of this and the help I’ve had on the Nationwide Safety Council and throughout the weather of presidency – the departments and businesses – has been stellar. And we’ll proceed to work on this and get it proper as a result of we’ve three and a half extra years of President Trump’s administration to get this proper, do the reps and units, and make this a sturdy coverage in order that the American folks can begin having fun with these advantages that come after we’re actually centered on this house.
Kelly: What does success appear like for you on this function and the way do you measure it?
Chenoweth: Measurement has at all times been a humorous factor. Individuals will consistently inform me how arduous it’s to measure these actions. And what I’ve discovered time and time once more is that we’re truly fairly good at these actions. The problems with the measurements are, once more, taking part at a scale that issues. We have to measure conduct change, and as a way to try this, we have to have clear goals. What are we after?
The large a part of that’s who’s the audience that has the company to do the factor we wish? We spend plenty of time planning and CONOPS [Concept of Operations] on sub-target audiences that do not even have the company – in hopes that they have an effect on company – and that is completely high quality. However why are we doing assessments towards this? We spend plenty of money and time producing assessments to focus on audiences that do not have the company you need. So, let’s give attention to the audience that has the company and let’s do that at scale.
For instance; I am within the DC space and I can go right down to the Potomac River, drop a bucket of water within the river, and I’ve objectively molecularly elevated the quantity of water within the Potomac. There is not a sensor on this planet that’s going to detect that molecular change.
The very fact is that you simply is perhaps having an impact, however you do not have a sensor that’s going to select that up. So, it’s good to improve your scale or customise your sensing system to the impact you are having. That tends to be the place the assessments crumble.
I’ve heard on a regular basis for many years now that assessments are so arduous. I do not discover that to be true. What I discover is that you have sacrificed assessments for impact, which is ok. It is danger calculus. If I had a low quantity of sources and I made a decision to place as a lot into the impact I’ve wished, that is high quality. However on the finish of the day, you are searching for the actual conduct change within the focused viewers that issues. What are the sensors you will have on that and what are you doing to gather that information: public opinion, analysis surveys, constructing the networks. We’ll see this exacerbate additional because the AI revolution continues at tempo.
Kelly: How is know-how impacting what you are making an attempt to do, your mission, after which how are you additionally working with the non-public sector as a result of the non-public sector is controlling a lot of the know-how and the innovation that the federal government must work with. So how are you doing that?
Chenoweth: One of many challenges I see rising from AI is that there is type of an assumption that AI will repair all of your woes. I’ve seen the most effective instruments on the market do one factor: they mannequin the info they’ve, and that is the core challenge. We do not have the info. So once more, I am again to there’s not a complete lot of latest issues below the solar. And the AI fashions are actually good, and it might probably help you discover new insights from the info that you’ve, however new information must be created. So, sacrificing assortment methodologies and new approaches to assemble the info on the foot of a mannequin is horrible.
The AI snake oil salesman I’d take care of in business on a regular basis would are available in and say, ‘Oh, you are involved in that? I might completely mannequin you the factor.’ Cool. How does that work? ‘Properly, all you need to do is present me the info and we’ll put all this collectively and provide the insights.’ I am like, whoa. We do not have the info both. Nobody has the info. That is type of the issue. So, let’s be trustworthy about what we’re doing.
AI goes to be an important boon for business and for the federal government and everybody else below the solar. It is going to clearly have affect, however I believe as that strikes ahead, we have to begin how we truly make use of it. Constructing an agent or a token for each employee so that they are augmented by an AI that does the factor that they themselves will not be good at or saving them time goes to be superb, but it surely must be undergirded by with the ability to detect what’s truly occurring out in the actual world. And people two issues usually are not essentially – not interrelated. As I mentioned, most issues are variety of a complete cell that function in a single unit, and we won’t essentially bifurcate this stuff after which anticipate good outcomes.
Former Senior CIA Govt Dave Pitts wrote a three-part collection solely for The Cipher Transient on what the U.S. can do to turn into extra aggressive within the Grey Zone. Subscriber+Members can learn it right here. Want entry? We will help with that.
Kelly: So you will have a mission that’s tough to measure, is vastly impactful, adversaries are utilizing it as effectively towards Americans successfully, and in some circumstances, these adversaires are dedicating much more sources to this. When you might explaine to the typical U.S. citizen how they is perhaps focused by cognitive operations which might be carried out by U.S. adversaries, what would you inform them to search for?
Chenoweth: It is advisable to be conscious of sources clearly. After I take a look at the assemble of how we method cognitive warfare, I believe one of many greatest issues I’ve had for not less than the final 10 years has been the assemble of dis- and misinformation. My challenge is not the dis- and misinformation assemble. It is the overuse of it.
Disinformation and misinformation are issues. They’ve that means. However they imply one thing that’s true and folks use it for issues that aren’t true. For instance, disinformation are lies. The individual projecting the data is aware of it is a lie. They’re doing it to perform an goal. The larger downside of disinformation is misinformation. These are people who find themselves sharing these lies, not understanding they’re lies, or taking issues out of context like satire, et cetera, and propagating as if it have been reality. These are what these are.
However not the whole lot we’ve to take care of falls into that assemble. There are two different parts to this that we’ve to be conscious of.
One is lacking info, which used to imply that the audience wasn’t knowledgeable sufficient to make an accurate resolution, favorable to them or anybody else. ‘It is a tragedy that your member of the family died and you must mourn their loss, however cease touching the physique. That is the way you’re spreading Ebola’, proper? Fairly simple, fairly easy.
Now that we’re coping with nation states with deep pockets, that is been flipped up on its head they usually’re practising energetic lacking info, the place they’ll present wire companies into a rustic saying, ‘Congratulations, you should utilize our wire service free of charge and we’ll present you all of the stuff, and that is your greatest value apart from labor. Is not that fantastic? The catch is that you simply simply have to make use of our wire service’.
When you suppose [contextual] tales are going to get into the press by means of these channels, good luck. This is not occurring within the third world. These are occurring in main international locations and locations that might shock you.
Think about one thing like, ‘When you run this story, all our linked companies which might be linked by means of us or different means are going to tug their promoting finances from you.’ So once more, good luck speaking concerning the story in your setting. Nobody’s going to the touch it. No influencer desires a bit of it as a result of they are going to lose their incentive construction and their income stream. It is issues like that.
On the opposite facet of the coin, and the larger downside, is the rhetoric info. These are the issues that are not essentially true or false. They’re framed by your worth system, the way you view issues, what you suppose reality truly is.
There are folks on the market who will say, I believe a communist socialist type of authorities that’s extremely authoritarian is extra secure and subsequently higher than a liberal democracy. There are individuals who consider that, and simply by saying, effectively, historical past would show you in any other case, it isn’t a adequate argument. It is advisable to interact with these folks at a scale that issues and be ready to win the argument.
We have seen this time once more on the counter-terrorism entrance the place we’d shut down the comms of a no one, and instantly that individual would come again with the fame that was so invaluable, and now they are a terrorist thought chief as a result of the Western world thought that they have been so harmful they wanted to be shut down as an alternative of simply accepting the actual fact, that perhaps we must always simply interact with this man as a result of nobody’s ever heard of him and perhaps we must always simply level out that he is a moron.
There are methods to take care of this, and simply because we do not like one thing doesn’t suggest it is a misinform the individual that’s spreading it. They could consider it. Earlier than we simply title one thing disinformation and say, effectively, it is a lie and we are able to ignore it — that isn’t sufficient within the fashionable period the place everyone seems to be linked as a result of, once more, this individual has connective tissue to the web. They’ve internet platforms. They are often simply as linked as a authorities if they need to select to be and if they’ve the recognition, as a result of at its core, no matter whether or not or not you are a authorities or a celeb or anything, you might be preventing for consideration.
Kelly: It’s generally tough for busy Individuals to navigate the data house at present and know what to consider with out inviting some critical time into the supply. Do you take a look at a part of your mission on this function as serving to folks perceive extra of the context they want as a way to make good choices?
Chenoweth: I have been extra on the facet coping with overseas audiences. However even in that regard, I believe that it actually issues to ask what are the issues that we all know to be what we really feel are goal truths and issues that matter? Issues that we wish goal audiences to know as a result of we all know it might be higher for them and higher for our goals?
After which what are the issues the place we simply wish to ensure that if a debate must be had, we facilitate the controversy in order that the audience, notably with an American audience – which once more, it isn’t my forte, we do not try this in authorities or should not — that must be facilitated by Individuals stating to one another that we do must have these debates and are available to type of consensus, understanding that there can be disagreements.
Kelly: Do you suppose your job goes to be much more essential sooner or later or perhaps much less?
Chenoweth: I’ve by no means thought the job wasn’t essential. I believe the factor I am having fun with proper now’s that everybody’s type of getting their head round what this implies. The overused expression that ‘We have to do some issues on Fb,’ while you would have policymakers say, ‘Properly, I am involved that that might destroy Amazon and web commerce’ and your head would explode as you are making an attempt to clarify, ‘That is simply not how the web works, man.’
We will be snug working on these platforms and doing issues that we have to do with out destroying web commerce or the web. And now I believe plenty of coverage makers and business are all linked. They’re much more snug doing this stuff. Now could be the time when we have to get to the place the sources and the permissions actually match the power to get us the place we have to be.
I’ve usually not discovered too many authority issues. I usually discover permissions issues. I discover that on the subject of authorities, you nearly at all times discover that each group truly has a framework that permits them to do issues. It is simply that somebody someplace within the chain can say no and is all too snug saying no, as a result of, notably up to now administration, they have been very snug at avoiding danger and never as snug at managing danger. And that may be a dynamic that we’ve to alter. The world is a dangerous place, and we have to be on the market taking part in it, throwing our elbows round and managing the danger, not avoiding it.
Kelly: How arduous of a job is it to present the U.S. the cognitive benefit in at present’s world?
Chenoweth: It is arduous, tremendously arduous since you’re speaking about altering tradition. I do not suppose the exercise itself and the coverage and the issues that may be finished are arduous. I believe the arduous half can be altering the tradition and altering folks’s mindsets.
We have talked about the truth that there was three domains: bodily area, info area and cognitive area. We now have to discover the data area and really name it what it’s. There’s the bodily area, the geophysical area. However I just like the ‘kill internet’ method. An excellent kill internet will represent a kill chain that’s disrupted, and we’ve to get out of only a kill chain. We have to get right into a kill internet mentality on the subject of cognitive results.
Kelly: Clarify what you imply by a “kill internet”?
Chenoweth: You will have your geophysical world the place issues exist in the actual world, the place the place all of us reside. Relating to the data area, although, it used to consolidate a bunch of issues.
The truth is that after we break that down right into a kill internet, you are wanting out of your bodily area as much as your logic layer. The web will not be some amorphous cloud that wanders round. It is composed of a system of techniques that reside in the actual world. It is information facilities, servers, modems, et cetera. The place does that infrastructure truly exist? Generally the information are within the laptop. So, we have to be conscious of the place does that work? How does the web, how do these buildings work, the cellular networks, et cetera.
From there, it then creates the digital layer, the place all of the trons are that exist. You may have results, that is the place your actual our on-line world comes into play. That is how the cellular units work, however that’s simply information.
Then it goes as much as the persona entity degree. These are the actual human beings, generally pretend human beings, they’re personas, organizations however entities that doubtlessly may very well be focused or addressed or engaged, et cetera.
After which there’s the cognitive house. The trick within the cognitive house is what occurs within the thoughts. And that thoughts is influenced by the sensing that goes up by means of that chain once they course of it. You are in a position to interdict on its manner up or affect, and also you’re in a position to affect on the way in which down when a choice is made.
For instance, when one thing occurs in the actual world, it is communicated to a choice maker, however it’ll undergo the logic layer transmitted by means of sensors, computer systems, emails, telephones, et cetera, to folks and entities who’re going to course of it themselves, talk it to a choice maker who’s going to decide primarily based off that info, or a person or a bunch of people.
They’re all going to make choices on the way to react to that or not react to that. And that is going to return right down to the bodily world once they say, ‘I do not actually like what is going on’, or perhaps ‘I do like what’s occurring. Let’s do the factor’. They will talk that right down to ‘Sure, launch the missiles’, or ‘Let’s have a protest’. So, you may have an effect on the chain up. You may have an effect on the chain down, however that is the way it works.
We as the US have a pipe that exists inside that kill internet construction – so does everybody else. And it would not matter for those who’re a nation state or a household or a person. You will have your sensing sources.
As I discussed earlier, the direct conversations between folks in the actual world – even now, you and I are speaking fully over that total construction – and that construction may very well be affected on the way in which up as we’re speaking to when that is lastly produced and goes again out to the actual world the place instantly I’ve AI results on me and I am saying issues I by no means meant to say, however the remainder of the world’s now deciphering that.
I did not say that, that wasn’t my cognitive resolution, however you intercepted on the way in which down and now you’ll inadvertently have an effect on everybody else’s cognitive method to what I am speaking.
Kelly: What does the longer term from a know-how and AI standpoint actually appear like?
Chenoweth: It is having basic modifications. It is going to be attention-grabbing to see what occurs within the leisure business as AI takes over and instantly folks can have extra entry. We have seen how the music business went by means of enormous change simply on streaming music. We’re about to witness what that is going to appear like from our extra conventional platforms. We have seen how issues transfer from streaming. I believe there’s a degree of adaptation that is going to go together with that.
One of many issues that must be addressed is how precisely we’ll interact. There’s a level the place we have to be snug with giving type of steerage to the AIs – human within the loop – however for those who suppose that you are going to have the ability to assessment each single message that should exit in an AI-driven world, you are out of your thoughts.
So, you want to have the ability to be snug producing on your audience profiles and provides type of thematic steerage and let the AI do some degree of engagements towards overseas audiences to steer conversations in a specific route, or not less than determine the place a dialog is perhaps going so you may intervene when it seems like choices are being made in a nasty manner, after which discover out if that’s an open and trustworthy cultural nuance factor the place it’s about engagement or if it is being steered by your opponent.
I believe that we aren’t far, and we’re most likely already in a sport, the place there are AIs versus AIs as we converse within the info setting.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
