Join Chalkbeat Colorado’s free day by day e-newsletter to get the most recent reporting from us, plus curated information from different Colorado retailers, delivered to your inbox.
A Colorado Springs-area college board voted Thursday evening to ban transgender college students from center and highschool sports activities groups that match their gender id.
The three-2 vote in District 49, a conservative-leaning district with 27,000 college students, got here after impassioned testimony from each supporters and opponents of the brand new coverage, known as “Preserving Equity and Security in Sports activities.”
The high-profile choice in District 49, Colorado’s tenth largest, follows a February government order from President Trump focusing on transgender youth in sports activities and represents a shift that might quickly be replicated in different districts within the state. However the brand new coverage additionally raises the specter of a lawsuit over the ban and a number of questions on how the brand new guidelines shall be utilized.
Opponents of the coverage say transgender college students are at better threat for bullying, isolation, and psychological well being points, and that denying them entry to sports activities groups that match their gender id will solely exacerbate these issues. Supporters say the coverage protects women from getting harm by transgender gamers or shedding out on enjoying time, wins, or athletic scholarships. Either side appear to agree that transgender college students signify a tiny fraction of group sports activities individuals.
Beginning subsequent college yr, District 49’s new coverage will bar transgender women from women sports activities and transgender boys from boys sports activities. It’s not clear who will police the gender id of pupil athletes.
In an interview earlier this week, District 49 Board President Lori Thompson stated particular guidelines should be developed and steered {that a} query about gender id may very well be added to the required sports activities bodily type.
She dismissed worries that surfaced throughout weeks of debate that the coverage would imply college officers could be checking college students’ genitals to find out which group they’ll be part of.
“That won’t be occurring,” she stated at Thursday’s assembly.
However gender traces in class sports activities are already a bit blurry, highlighting potential inconsistencies within the new coverage’s rationale that it’s unsafe for ladies to compete with boys. For instance, whereas sort out soccer and baseball are thought-about boys sports activities, women are allowed to take part and have executed so at District 49 excessive colleges, based on highschool athletic administrators within the district. As well as, wrestling is taken into account a co-ed sport at District 49 center colleges, with girls and boys competing in opposition to one another.
It’s unclear if transgender boys — individuals assigned feminine at delivery who determine as male — shall be barred from District 49’s boys sports activities groups, at the same time as women are allowed to play on these groups, or if women shall be barred as effectively. As well as, it’s unclear how District 49 groups will deal with competitors in opposition to out-of-district groups that embody transgender athletes: Will they play or forfeit?
For years, the Colorado Excessive Faculty Actions Affiliation has acknowledged the best of transgender athletes to take part on sports activities groups that match their gender id. However that appeared to alter after greater than 60 Colorado college and district officers, together with Thompson and three others from District 49, despatched the group a letter in April demanding it undertake guidelines “to make sure that boys are usually not permitted to compete as women in women’ sports activities.”
Subsequently, the actions affiliation took a extra noncommittal stance. At a current occasion, the group’s lawyer described its place as “impartial” and stated that figuring out eligibility for sports activities groups is a matter of native management.
At Thursday’s District 49 college board assembly, many district residents spoke out concerning the proposed coverage.
A person named Kevin, whose youngsters attended college within the district and whose grandchildren are actually rising up there, stated there’s no place for boys in women sports activities.
“You possibly can determine as who you need, however biologically, that’s the game you play,” he stated. “All this criss-crossing into sports activities, being within the ladies’s dressing rooms, bogs, and stuff like that, that’s a no-go.”
Holly Withers, the mom of two district college students, stated the coverage appeared much less about defending equity and security and extra about selling an ideological agenda.
“Our college students deserve colleges that carry them up, not insurance policies that single them out, and I hope that this board will select to be remembered for management and never for excessive litigation,” she stated.
Board member Mike Heil, considered one of two members who voted no on Thursday, stated even when the coverage isn’t used, it sends the message to transgender college students that “we don’t worth them.”
“I don’t assume that’s who we have to be as a board,” he stated.
Thompson, who voted for the coverage, stated, “If we don’t acknowledge physiological variations, ladies’s sports activities will stop to exist.”
However she additionally stated she needs everybody to really feel welcomed and included.
“There’s no option to make everybody completely happy,” she stated. “That’s the place it’s important to make powerful selections.”
Ann Schimke is a senior reporter at Chalkbeat, protecting early childhood points and early literacy. Contact Ann at aschimke@chalkbeat.org.
