OPINION — The battle in Ukraine has developed into a fancy geopolitical battle, formed not solely by navy technique however by international financial dependencies. Whereas Western nations proceed to supply monetary and navy help, a important vulnerability has emerged: Ukraine’s heavy reliance on Chinese language drone elements. The Ukrainian drone producers with whom I’ve spoken admit that their drones are constructed from as a lot as 65% Chinese language elements. This dependence, whereas tactically mandatory, has a paradoxical consequence: Western help inadvertently strengthens the very provide chains that additionally profit Russia, thereby prolonging the battle.
Finally, Ukraine will solely win this battle by forcing Russia to spend sufficient that persevering with to ship troopers and gear into Ukraine turns into financially untenable. As a result of China maintains a strategic place in international expertise manufacturing—particularly in drone components—each Ukraine and Russia draw from the identical pool of sources, albeit by means of totally different channels. This paradox raises pressing questions concerning the effectiveness of Western help and the long-term technique for ending the battle.
Fairly than persevering with to fund Ukraine’s drone purchases, the West ought to prioritize dismantling Chinese language provide chain dominance. Doing so wouldn’t solely weaken Russia’s entry to important applied sciences but in addition strengthen Western industrial capability and scale back international reliance on China. Financial technique, not simply navy assist, is vital to resolving the battle in Ukraine and getting ready for future international conflicts.
Ukraine’s Dependence on Chinese language Drone Parts
Because the onset of Russia’s full-scale invasion, drones have develop into a cornerstone of Ukraine’s protection. Throughout a latest journey to the Ukrainian entrance traces, a Ukrainian commander defined, “The DJI Mavic is the king of battle. Nothing else is even shut.” DJI drones are manufactured in China, and by 2023, Ukraine was reportedly buying as much as 30% of the corporate’s international Mavic manufacturing.
This dependence, nonetheless, has develop into a strategic legal responsibility. In 2024 and 2025, China imposed export restrictions on drone elements to Ukraine, together with flight controllers, motors, and navigation cameras. Via this reliance, Ukraine is handing China management over its capacity to maintain the battle. These restrictions have severely disrupted Ukraine’s drone provide chain, resulting in shortages on the entrance traces and forcing navy items to hunt alternate options.
This dynamic reveals a troubling actuality: the identical Chinese language elements Ukraine is dependent upon have been present in Russian drones, together with the Iranian-designed Shahed loitering munitions used to assault Ukrainian cities.
China’s Twin Position: Proscribing Ukraine, Empowering Russia
China’s function within the Ukraine battle is marked by strategic ambiguity—publicly claiming neutrality whereas quietly enabling Russia’s battle effort. This posture has had profound penalties for each side of the battlefield. On one hand, China has imposed export restrictions on drone elements to Ukraine, severely limiting its capacity to provide drones for frontline operations. Then again, China continues to provide Russia with dual-use applied sciences, equivalent to semiconductors, drone engines, and optical sensors, that are important to sustaining Moscow’s drone manufacturing. And at last, shopping for Chinese language elements strengthens China’s financial system, which permits them to assist disruptive regimes, specifically Russia.
Proof of China’s assist for Russia is mounting. In July 2025, Ukraine imposed sanctions on 5 Chinese language corporations after recovering Chinese language-made components from downed Russian Shahed drones which had been utilized in assaults on Kyiv. These companies—starting from precision munitions producers to logistics suppliers—had been supplying elements that bypass Western sanctions. This selective restriction technique advantages Russia disproportionately.
Regardless of efforts to scale home manufacturing, Ukraine’s drone trade stays constrained by restricted entry to important elements and manufacturing capability, making purchases from China a necessity. The result’s a battlefield dynamic during which Ukraine’s technological edge is more and more undermined by its dependence on a provide chain managed by a rustic that’s, at finest, strategically ambiguous, and at worst, actively enabling Russia’s battle effort.
Join the Cyber Initiatives Group Sunday e-newsletter, delivering expert-level insights on the cyber and tech tales of the day – on to your inbox. Join the CIG e-newsletter as we speak.
Western Funding and Its Unintended Penalties
Whereas Western nations have poured billions into Ukraine’s drone trade with the intent of giving them a battlefield benefit, a good portion of Ukraine’s drone manufacturing nonetheless is dependent upon Chinese language elements. This creates a troubling paradox: Western funding supposed to assist Ukraine could also be not directly sustaining Chinese language provide chains that profit Russia. The issue isn’t just tactical—it’s structural. Western help has targeted on scaling manufacturing slightly than rebuilding provide chains.
Many Ukrainian drone factories that declare home manufacturing are literally solely assembling imported Chinese language elements. And it’s not their fault; there aren’t any viable alternate options to the Chinese language elements wanted to fabricate superior drones. This dependency undermines the strategic worth of Western funding and dangers prolonging the battle by preserving each side tethered to the identical international provide community.
Strategic Shift: Change Chinese language Provide Chains
To really assist Ukraine—and to arrange for future geopolitical challenges—Western nations should rethink their strategy. Funding ought to be redirected from drone purchases to constructing resilient, non-Chinese language provide chains. This implies investing in home and allied manufacturing of important elements, supporting Ukrainian innovation by means of switch of elements, and creating joint manufacturing hubs in Europe and North America which promote to Ukraine at backed costs. Doing so can have the secondary profit of creating manufacturing capability and experience in Europe and North America, whereas concurrently decreasing money stream to China. Solely by severing the hyperlink to Chinese language provide chains can the West be sure that its help will not be inadvertently resourcing its adversaries.
Momentum is constructing for this variation. In 2025, the U.S. authorities launched a collection of legislative reforms, together with the “Unleashing American Drone Dominance” Government Order, which mandates prioritization of U.S.-made drones for federal businesses. This was adopted by the DoD Procurement Directive and the FY2025 Nationwide Protection Authorization Act, which expanded budgets and imposed new boundaries on international drones. These strikes have catalyzed a surge in funding, and there appears to be higher emphasis on the horizon.
Europe can also be pivoting. The Atlantic Council’s technique temporary outlines a complete “protect-promote-align” framework to safe provide chains. This consists of banning Chinese language drones in delicate sectors, selling home manufacturing, and aligning insurance policies throughout NATO, the EU, and the G7. The objective is obvious: construct a resilient, safe, and democratic drone ecosystem that may face up to geopolitical shocks and assist allied protection wants.
Changing Chinese language provide chains is not going to solely shorten the battle in Ukraine by reducing off Russia’s entry to important applied sciences—it can additionally strengthen Western readiness for future conflicts. It would create jobs, foster innovation, and restore strategic autonomy.
The battle in Ukraine will not be solely a check of navy resilience however a mirrored image of worldwide financial interdependence. Ukraine’s reliance on Chinese language drone elements has created a strategic paradox—one during which Western help could also be inadvertently sustaining the very provide chains that empower Russia. China’s twin function, proscribing Ukraine whereas enabling Russia, underscores the urgency of rethinking how assist is structured. Continued funding for drone purchases, with out addressing the underlying provide chain vulnerabilities, dangers prolonging the battle and weakening the West’s strategic place.
To really assist Ukraine win, the West should shift its focus from short-term battlefield options to long-term financial technique. Changing Chinese language provide chains isn’t just about drones—it’s about restoring industrial sovereignty, decreasing dependence on authoritarian regimes, and getting ready for future conflicts. By investing in home and allied manufacturing, the West can construct a resilient protection ecosystem that serves each quick and future safety wants. Victory in Ukraine is not going to come solely by means of firepower—it can come by means of financial energy, strategic foresight, and the braveness to reshape the techniques that underpin fashionable warfare. The time to behave is now.
The Cipher Transient is dedicated to publishing a spread of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals.
Opinions expressed are these of the creator and don’t characterize the views or opinions of The Cipher Transient.
Have a perspective to share primarily based in your expertise within the nationwide safety area? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient
