Monday, March 2, 2026

For Good Has No Concept What To Do With Dorothy, And That is A Massive Drawback






This text accommodates spoilers for “Depraved: For Good.”

“Depraved: For Good” was all the time going to have quite a bit on its plate. The choice to separate Stephen Schwartz and Winnie Holzman’s 2003 Broadway sensation into two films was initially met with combined reception contemplating the stage play is about three hours lengthy with intermission. The primary movie in Jon M. Chu’s “Depraved” duology teeters proper on the sting with a 2 hour and 45 minute runtime, but it surely felt proper for this adaptation. The enlargement of act one used the additional time to additional construct upon the connection between Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) and Glinda (Ariana Grande-Butera). It made the swelling excessive of “Defying Gravity” a well-earned place to go away off because it made you are feeling you watched a complete film as a substitute of half of 1. You’ll suppose that this could give “For Good” much more grace to take its time adapting act two, but the movie weirdly performs like a rushed second half as a substitute of its personal film.

/Movie’s BJ Colangelo was quite a bit increased on “For Good” than I used to be in her evaluate, the place she acknowledged the movie’s faults, but nonetheless felt moved by the top. On prime of the movie’s lack of memorable songs and murky cinematography, I could not assist however be distracted by its messy plotting at odds with what the primary “Depraved” achieved. There’s loads to speak about right here, however I used to be maybe most baffled by its utilization of Dorothy Gale, the Kansas woman who will get swept up in an journey to fulfill the Wizard (Jeff Goldblum). You possibly can already envision the headache on behalf of Chu and firm in having to follow-up Judy Garland’s portrayal in Victor Fleming’s 1939 traditional. However what they give you right here exacerbates the problem greater than anything.

Obscuring Dorothy proves to be much more of a distraction

It is about midway by way of “For Good” when Madam Morrible (Michelle Yeoh) conjures the home twister that crushes the tyrannical Nessarose (Marissa Bode) as a way to attract out Elphaba. In the event you’ve ever seen something “Oz”-related, that inside it resides a really confused Dorothy. However by the point Elphaba arrives in Munchkinland, Glinda has already given away the silver slippers to Dorothy, who’s marching her manner down the Yellow Brick Highway. The following time we see her, she’s already talking with the Wizard’s mechanical facade alongside the Tin Man, Cowardly Lion, and the Scarecrow. After some time, it seems that “For Good” has no intention of exhibiting Dorothy from the entrance, nor giving her any strains, regardless of being performed by UK actress Bethany Weaver. She’s not even a personality, a lot as a story obligation.

The Broadway present additionally retains Dorothy’s presence to a minimal, however that has extra to do with condensing a lot of Gregory Maguire’s 1995 novel into a 3 hour stage manufacturing. She’s largely offscreen, along with her most distinguished look being in silhouette when she tosses the bucket of water onto Elphaba. However films are a lot completely different beasts than stage productions. The problem I’ve is not a lot that Dorothy is not an expanded character regardless that she’s technically an necessary driving issue of the story and the way these characters converge. It is the truth that each try and obscure Weaver’s face and voice calls even extra consideration to her specter-like look.

The choice performs like Chu desires to withhold her face for a revelation that by no means comes. Dorothy is an enigma in “For Good,” which is unusual since her minimal inclusion makes the movie really feel prefer it’s lacking a complete bunch.

Depraved: For Good proves that what works on stage does not all the time work on the display screen

“For Good” typically seems like somebody hit the chapter skip button on the distant each time it instantly flashes between these massive gaps in time the place a complete bunch of stuff occurred. Previous to Dorothy bringing the home down, Elphaba does her finest to course-correct a rogue spell Nessarose made in opposition to Boq (Ethan Slater), which in the end ends in him being became the Tin Man. We obtain yet one more origin story for one of many well-known “Wizard of Oz” group members, as Elphaba makes use of the Grimmerie to show the tortured Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey) into the Scarecrow. Chu spends a lot time increase the horrifying transformations of those two characters, but each are distractingly absent from many of the huge developments within the movie’s third act.

We by no means get to see how Boq and Fiyero work together alongside Dorothy on this various historical past of “The Wizard of Oz,” particularly in the massive sequence the place they douse Elphaba with water in Kiamo Ko fortress. It is an try and maintain issues largely centered on Elphaba and Glinda’s perspective. Nonetheless, in not increasing upon Boq’s rage, nor Fiyero’s conflicted emotions, shielding Dorothy from being an precise character makes their arcs really feel unsatisfying throughout the confines of being an ensemble image. What could have labored on the stage does not all the time translate effectively for the display screen, particularly since it has been confirmed that increasing the story labored out for Chu the primary time round. In “For Good,” Dorothy informs every thing and nothing on the identical time.

“Depraved: For Good” is now taking part in in theaters nationwide.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles