In the event you’re seeking to construct no-code or low-code automation, you could have stumbled upon Make and Zapier. Each are widespread in our Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) class, and whereas they might appear comparable at first look, they serve barely totally different person wants.Selecting the best device issues as a result of it instantly impacts how effectively your workforce can automate duties, scale workflows, and combine the instruments you already depend on. A mismatch in platform capabilities can imply wasted time, larger prices, or pointless complexity.
I’ve in contrast Make vs. Zapier intimately based mostly on totally different necessities, like person interface, flexibility, integrations, performance, and pricing.
The fitting alternative will depend on what you worth most. In my evaluation, I discovered Make to be a most popular alternative to be used circumstances involving sophisticated workflows. Zapier is extra appropriate to be used circumstances that want general-purpose automation.
Make vs. Zapier: At a look
Right here’s a fast comparability of the favored iPaaS software program:
| Function | Make | Zapier |
| G2 ranking | 4.7/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Greatest for | Energy customers and complicated workflows | Novices and general-purpose automation |
| Person interface (UI) and suppleness | Visible drag-and-drop canvas (very versatile) | Step-by-step kind builder (easier) |
| Automation capabilities | Superior options like limitless steps/branches and information dealing with | Easy automations with fastened step limits |
| Scalability | Price-efficient at excessive quantity (10k+ ops/month) | Scales with enterprise-grade safety, limitless customers, and admin controls |
| Integrations | ~2,400+ apps, with deeper API assist | 7,000+ apps |
| Help & group | Robust group, good documentation, however fewer third-party tutorials | Bigger group, tons of guides/tutorials, and broader ecosystem assist |
| Pricing | Free, as much as 1,000 ops/month. The pricing begins from $9/month for 10,000 ops | Free for 100 duties/month. The pricing begins from $19.99/month (multistep) |
Observe: The main points right here replicate probably the most present capabilities as of August 2025. Each Make and Zapier proceed to evolve quickly, so options and pricing could change over time.
Earlier than we discover Make and Zapier, let’s rapidly assessment the variations and similarities between the 2 instruments.
TL;DR: Make is highly effective, versatile, and cost-efficient — finest for energy customers, technical groups, and companies that have to automate advanced workflows with branching logic, superior information dealing with, and excessive job volumes. Zapier is easier, beginner-friendly, and integrates with 7,000+ apps, making it the go-to alternative for fast, general-purpose automation and not using a steep studying curve. Make shines in pricing, scalability, and workflow depth, whereas Zapier dominates in app protection, ease of use, and enterprise-ready options. For advanced, budget-conscious automation, select Make. For easy, plug-and-play automation with most integrations, Zapier leads.
Make vs. Zapier: What’s totally different?
Right here’s an summary of the important thing variations between the 2 software program.
- Integration depend and depth: Zapier connects to way more apps — over 7,000 and counting. Whereas Make lists round 2,400, it provides many extra actions per app, for instance, 84 actions for Xero vs. 25 in Zapier.
- Workflow builder type: Zapier makes use of a linear, form-based builder with dropdowns and a step-by-step wizard, which makes it nice for novices. Make provides a visible drag-and-drop canvas. In follow, I discovered Zapier’s interface easier to begin with, whereas Make’s canvas felt extra pure and versatile as soon as I realized it.
- Automation complexity: Make handles advanced situations with limitless steps, routes, or branches, and highly effective information instruments like arrays, JSON parsing, and so on. Zapier automation (Zaps) is usually extra easy: They’re simple to construct however have fastened limits, e.g., a most of 100 steps, and fewer built-in information instruments.
- Pricing mannequin: Zapier fees by duties, the place every app motion is a job on tiered plans, and now even provides pay-per-task billing. Make fees by operations, i.e., every module run. In my checks, Make’s paid plans give way more operations for the value — for instance, $9/mo for 10,000 operations vs. $19.99 for simply 750 Zapier duties. Make may be less expensive at scale, although the billing math may be complicated.
Make vs. Zapier: What’s comparable?
Each Make and Zapier ship options to create, check, and deploy automations with flexibility. There are a number of similarities you possibly can’t miss, for instance:
- Visible editors are intuitive, with ample pre-built templates that assist new customers get began. Neither device requires code to design fundamental automation for duties.
- Free tier choices is obtainable in each plans, with a paid plan for rising utilization. Make facilitates 1000 operations whereas Zapier caters to 100 duties within the free model.
- Person base for each iPaaS software program is equally sturdy and numerous. They cater to a spread of customers, from solo entrepreneurs to enterprise groups. The 2 software program have an excellent quantity of documentation, tutorials, and communities that customers can faucet for assist.
How I in contrast Make and Zapier: My analysis standards
First, I checked out ease of use. This meant seeing how easy the interface and setup felt for somebody new, and how briskly I may construct a fundamental automation. Elements like interface design, navigation, the provision of templates, tooltips, and onboarding guides helped tip the size.
For my workflows, integrations, and most significantly, the depth of integrations was essential. The depth of integration represents the provision of actions that I can carry out by the combination. For this, I examined how every platform handles app performance and whether or not there have been limitations or workarounds wanted.
I additionally thought of assist and group, and skimmed by every platform’s assist heart, boards, and assist choices. This helped me see the provision of self-service by the platform’s information base.
For any shopping for course of, pricing transparency was an enormous issue. I verified that in my check and in contrast each choices to find out their cost-effectiveness.
Disclaimer: These insights are based mostly on hands-on testing of Make and Zapier as of August 2025. Platform options, pricing, and performance could evolve over time. This assessment displays particular person expertise and opinions on the time of analysis and doesn’t signify the official stance or endorsement of G2. For the most recent updates, seek the advice of Make and Zapier instantly.
Make vs. Zapier: How they really carried out in my checks
Let’s discuss efficiency. I examined Make and Zapier to see what they do properly and the place they fall brief. Right here’s what I discovered.
Person interface and suppleness
In follow, utilizing every device highlighted their trade-offs. Zapier’s UI felt intuitive. It walks you thru triggers and actions with clear types. The platform was pretty easy to make use of and navigate, and Zapier Copilot even provided related strategies to help.
The platform permits the creation of Zaps with easy strategies. After I was simply beginning, I may create a easy “if e-mail then alert me” workflow in minutes and not using a tutorial.
However, Make’s UI is a canvas of modules you drag and join. At first, it felt overwhelming, however quickly I appreciated with the ability to visually lay out a number of branches and see information circulation between steps.
For advanced flows, Make’s editor gave me rather more management. I may add routers, loops, and information transformations on the fly. I’d say Zapier wins if simplicity is your purpose, however Make pulls forward on flexibility.
As an influence person, I gave a slight edge to Make due to that flexibility and visible readability.
Winner: Make
App integrations
After I in contrast integrations, the numbers instructed one story: Zapier has extra apps. In testing, each app I wished, for instance, Salesforce, Mailchimp, Google Analytics, and so on., was on Zapier.
A couple of instruments I constantly use didn’t have a Make integration in any respect, so I needed to skip them or use a generic webhook as a workaround. What’s extra, Zapier has an AI apps part with 250+ integrations, which Make lacks.
The depth of Make’s integrations was spectacular. For instance, Make lets me pull detailed bill information from Xero with a number of fields, whereas Zapier solely has elementary bill triggers.
Ultimately, if app availability is your precedence, Zapier wins since its library is so clearly dominated by measurement and fast connectors.
Winner: Zapier
Automation capabilities
To check performance, I constructed actual workflows of accelerating complexity. Easy duties, like posting kind responses to a Slack channel, had been simple on each. For extra advanced wants like information parsing, loops, and multi-branch logic, Make provided higher assist. For instance, I created a situation in Make that collected information from a number of sources, processed it with filters and array capabilities, after which uploaded a formatted report, all with out writing code.
Attempt doing that on a fundamental Zapier plan, and also you hit limits. Zapier capped my steps, and I needed to break the method into separate Zaps.
I additionally examined conditional branching on both. Make let me splinter one workflow into many routes with out restrict, whereas Zapier pressured me into its “Paths” function, which is extra inflexible.
General, Make dealt with my advanced checks extra gracefully with limitless steps and built-in information instruments. Zapier was dependable, however much less expressive.
Winner: Make
Pricing
Pricing was an eye-opener. I took two actual use circumstances: a small venture with a number of hundred duties per thirty days and a bigger venture with tens of 1000’s of duties. Zapier’s free tier (100 duties) was limiting for the small venture. I wanted a paid plan at $19.99/mo to get extra duties. Make provided 1,000 free ops; even its most cost-effective $9/mo plan gave 10,000 ops.
For the bigger venture, Zapier’s $19.99 plan solely lined 2,000 duties, plus overage charges, whereas Make’s $16 or $29 plans lined 10,000 ops every. It gave me way more headroom. I did the mathematics: Zapier was roughly $0.026 per job on their starter plan, whereas Make was about $0.0009 per operation. Nevertheless, Zapier’s newer “pay-per-task” billing allows you to add additional duties on demand, simplifying budgeting for fluctuating utilization.
In brief, Make was way more cost-efficient for my check situations. The one warning is that Make’s operations can deplete rapidly when you design very huge situations; I had to concentrate to that. Nonetheless, for many customers on a finances, Make gained the day.
Winner: Make
Right here’s a desk exhibiting the winner when it comes to totally different iPaaS software program options:
| Function | Winner | Why it gained |
| Person interface and suppleness | Make 🏆 | Visible canvas permits drag-and-drop workflows vs Zapier’s types. It gave extra inventive management. |
| App integrations | Zapier 🏆 | Zapier has an unlimited library of apps. It provides greater than 7,000 apps. Conversely, Make provides near 2400 apps. |
| Automation capabilities | Make 🏆 | I bought limitless steps/branches and information instruments in Make. Conversely, Zapier had fastened limits. |
| Pricing | Make 🏆 | It is less expensive per motion. Cost 10k ops for $9. It is advisable to pay rather more in Zapier’s case. |
Key insights on Make vs. Zapier from G2 information
I seemed into G2’s assessment information to search out strengths and adoption patterns for Make and Zapier. Right here’s what stands out:
Satisfaction scores
- Make has a good ease of use (88%), ease of setup (85%), and ease of doing enterprise (94%) scores.
- Zapier excels in ease of use (89%), ease of setup (88%), and ease of doing enterprise(90%).
Industries represented
- Make dominates advertising and promoting, laptop software program, IT providers, monetary providers, and accounting.
- Zapier has a robust presence in advertising and promoting, laptop software program, IT providers, the web, and monetary providers.
Highest-rated options
- Make excels in pre-built connectors (91%), real-time integration (91%), and circulation designer (92%).
- Zapier stands out for flow-designer (90%), pre-built connectors (87%), and information encryption (89%).
Lowest-rated options
- Make struggles with huge information processing (76%), digital information interchange (EDI) (77%), and useful resource definition (83%).
- Zapier struggles with utility programming interface (API) administration (82%), digital information interchange (EDI) (82%), and managed file switch (84%).
Continuously requested questions on Make vs. Zapier from G2 information
Q1. Which platform is extra appropriate for a newbie: Make or Zapier?
Zapier is usually higher for novices. Its step-by-step interface and plentiful tutorials make it very approachable. In my trials, I may create easy automations with out studying documentation. Make, with its drag-and-drop choices, has a steeper studying curve.
Q2. What can be a surefire dealbreaker when selecting between Make or Zapier?
The largest dealbreakers are normally integrations and particular function wants. If one platform doesn’t assist an app or motion you want, that forces your hand. For instance, in my comparability, Zapier had all 7,000+ main apps whereas Make was lacking a number of area of interest instruments I exploit.
Q3. Which device is healthier for AI and new app integrations?
Zapier presently leads right here, providing 250+ AI app integrations and Zapier Copilot to advocate workflows. Make helps superior APIs and customized modules however doesn’t but have a devoted AI market.
This autumn. Can I migrate workflows from Zapier to Make (or vice versa)?
There’s no one-click migration. Nevertheless, each platforms assist webhooks, APIs, and comparable triggers/actions. This implies workflows can normally be rebuilt, although advanced migrations could take time.
Q5. What industries favor Make vs. Zapier?
G2 assessment information reveals Make is widespread in advertising, IT providers, and monetary providers, the place advanced workflows are frequent. Due to its broad integrations, Zapier dominates in advertising, SaaS, and web providers.
Make vs. Zapier: The ultimate verdict
In the end, Zapier and Make are each stable automation platforms, however they cater to barely totally different wants. For somebody new to automation or with easy duties, I’d lean towards Zapier. Its interface is straightforward, and its large app library means you’ll nearly definitely discover any device you want.
I would advocate Make you probably have advanced workflows, technical necessities like dealing with information arrays or calling APIs, or a decent finances at scale. In my checks, its power-user options and decrease price per operation had been decisive.
Lastly, your resolution can be based mostly on what issues most to you. In the event you want fast and straightforward automation and broad compatibility, go along with Zapier. Attempt Make when you want deep customization and need to squeeze probably the most out of your greenback. Each instruments are sturdy, so that you’ll have the ability to automate duties both manner. Decide the one which matches your priorities.
Discover different Zapier options and Make options in your iPaaS wants.
This text was initially revealed in April 2025 and has been up to date with new data.
