Thursday, January 15, 2026

Kalshi argues that geography doesn’t matter in IGRA case


Kalshi, the main North American prediction market, argues that the situation of positioned bets doesn’t contradict the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).

The result betting supplier has been concerned in courtroom battles with the Blue Lake Rancheria, Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, and Hen Ranch Rancheria of the Me-Wuk Indians (the California Tribes) since July 2025.

Kalshi is in a heated debate with California Tribes

We reported that the tribes had been in a protracted authorized debate with Kalshi, and the Ho Chunk Nation has been vocal in its derision of the betting operator.

Saying, “Whereas masquerading as novel commodities and futures merchandise, these occasion contracts are, substantively, nothing greater than unlawful, unregulated wagers on the outcomes of sporting occasions.”

Kalshi claims that the corporate’s partnership with co-defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., and Robinhood Derivatives LLC (Robinhood) doesn’t represent a breach of the IGRA and has invoked a portion of the Illegal Web Playing Enforcement Act (UIGEA) to help its place that geography isn’t a priority for bets positioned on its app.

Critics have seen the portion of the UIEGA getting used as a flimsy defence, however Kalshi does fall underneath a selected department of the Commodity Change Act (CEA).

This implies the betting suppliers’ argument could exempt them, as wagering, particularly known as “guess or wager” by way of Kalshi, pertains to “any transaction performed on or topic to the foundations of a registered entity or exempt board of commerce underneath the CEA.”

Authorized loophole provides Kalshi a sliver of hope

“Kalshi doesn’t home servers on Indian lands. Kalshi doesn’t make use of personnel on Indian lands. Kalshi conducts no enterprise in any way on Indian lands,” mentioned the New York-based firm.

This might imply that Kalshi is exempt as an change that falls underneath the CEA; nonetheless, critics level out that these potential technical and authorized loopholes in regards to the firm are outdated, and that wagers will be positioned on Tribal Lands through the Robinhood app, which might represent a breach of the IGRA.

Kalshi additionally argued that it might endure irreparable monetary hurt because of the injunction introduced by the California Tribes within the U.S. District Court docket for the District of California.

The predictions supplier said that it must stop buying and selling to control the situation of bets positioned to align the areas of Tribal Lands.

Regardless of the end result, the listening to on the potential injunction on 23 October 2025 is about to be a marquee affair and will result in severe authorized disputes over tribal relationships and the way forward for the IGRA.

Featured picture: Canva

The submit Kalshi argues that geography doesn’t matter in IGRA case appeared first on ReadWrite.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles