Sunday, March 22, 2026

State warns IPS to not hinder immigration enforcement

Join Chalkbeat Indiana’s free each day e-newsletter to maintain up with Indianapolis Public Faculties, Marion County’s township districts, and statewide schooling information.

Indiana Lawyer Common Todd Rokita is threatening authorized motion towards Indianapolis Public Faculties if it doesn’t cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

In a letter Wednesday to the varsity district’s lawyer, Rokita argued that the district’s dedication to restrict Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers’ entry to varsities and faculty information “can’t be squared with state regulation and have to be modified.”

“Unquestionably, faculty grounds often is the website of vital immigration enforcement exercise,” Rokita wrote. “Legal gang members who’re in america illegally have in some circumstances enrolled in public faculties.”

The risk from the state comes at a time when faculties are scurrying to answer new immigration enforcement insurance policies from President Donald Trump’s second administration. In January, the administration rescinded a earlier coverage that restricted immigration arrests at “delicate” areas, comparable to faculties.

Trump additionally issued an govt order permitting state regulation enforcement officers to carry out the features of immigration officers.

Indiana Gov. Mike Braun adopted with an govt order days later, directing Indiana regulation enforcement businesses to “absolutely cooperate” with Trump’s order and federal immigration authorities. (Braun later clarified that he wouldn’t direct Indiana regulation enforcement to enter faculties as a result of Trump’s govt order didn’t point out faculties particularly, in response to WFYI).

Rokita additionally despatched an analogous letter to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Division.

A spokesperson for IPS didn’t instantly return a request for remark.

Public faculties are required to teach college students no matter their immigration standing, a proper solidified within the 1982 Supreme Courtroom case Plyler v. Doe. IPS officers, overseeing a various district that features immigrant college students from a wide range of nations, together with Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico, and Guatemala, have sought to reassure members of the neighborhood about their dedication to that federal assure.

Amid a crackdown on unlawful immigration on the federal degree, IPS additionally launched a webpage to offer help for undocumented college students and households.

The location says that ICE brokers can not enter district faculties with out a judicial warrant, and that IPS employees are educated to deal with such conditions. It additionally says that the district strictly adheres to privateness legal guidelines involving pupil data, together with the federal Household Academic Rights and Privateness Act.

IPS additionally despatched an e-mail to employees final month reiterating its dedication to undocumented college students.

“Our faculties is not going to allow immigration enforcement actions on faculty grounds with out correct authorized documentation, and we is not going to ask about or share data relating to immigration standing,” the e-mail stated.

In his letter to IPS, Rokita relied totally on state legal guidelines and federal courtroom circumstances to again his argument that college and district officers are obligated to cooperate with federal regulation enforcement officers.

Rokita cited state regulation that forbids authorities entities from limiting the enforcement of federal immigration legal guidelines. And federal regulation, he argued, permits ICE brokers to apprehend individuals with an administrative warrant, the kind of warrant issued by ICE.

“IPS’s refusal to cooperate with ICE until ICE presents a judicial warrant is thus not per state regulation,” Rokita stated.

Citing elements of earlier federal courtroom circumstances, he additionally argued that ICE officers can enter faculty grounds with the consent of public faculty officers, even with out a judicial warrant — and that college officers can help with searches and seizures on faculty grounds.

State regulation additionally prohibits authorities businesses from adopting insurance policies that prohibit the sharing of data of citizenship or immigration standing with federal officers, Rokita stated in his letter.

Whereas the federal FERPA guidelines defend instructional information of scholars, Rokita argued that it does allow the disclosure of pupil listing data that may very well be associated to a pupil’s immigration standing. (Faculties can disclose such data, which might embrace identify, tackle, phone quantity, and hometown, with out consent — so long as they supply households a chance to request that such data not be disclosed).

Permitting federal authorities to entry faculty grounds could also be essential to protect faculty security, Rokita stated.

“Moreover, ICE can also require entry to high school grounds in sure cases to reunite a mother or father with a baby the place, for instance, the mother or father is scheduled for deportation and ICE seeks to make sure that the mother or father and little one are deported as a household unit,” the letter said.

Reporter Aleksandra Appleton contributed to this story.

Amelia Pak-Harvey covers Indianapolis and Lawrence Township faculties for Chalkbeat Indiana. Contact Amelia at apak-harvey@chalkbeat.org.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles