Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Suzuki Swift’s one-star security score debacle defined: Who’s in charge?


The boss of Suzuki Australia has defined why the newest Swift arrived Down Underneath with a sub-par security specification that led to a one-star ANCAP security score, and prompted subsequent upgrades to get it to a few stars.

“After we acquired the chance to have the brand new mannequin Swift in Australia, we selected the specification set that was accessible for the Australian and New Zealand market – we took that on board not figuring out there have been some structural variations to the car for the European market,” Michael Pachota, common supervisor for Suzuki Australia, advised CarExpert.

“[The] European automobile acquired a three-star [Euro] NCAP security score, our automobile acquired one star. We then fed that again to the producer, and so they mentioned “nicely, there’s a slight specification distinction within the car itself”, to which level we then mentioned “okay, that’s the automobile we’d like” – so we phased out the one-star automobile and introduced within the three-star automobile.”

CarExpert can prevent hundreds on a brand new automobile. Click on right here to get a terrific deal.

When requested if that set a precedent for Suzuki Australia to demand the most secure and best-performing NCAP variations of recent fashions any more, Mr Pachota mentioned “undoubtedly”.

“It wasn’t preferrred. It wasn’t preferrred. And sure, we did undoubtedly strongly voice that opinion [to Suzuki HQ]. However with that mentioned, Suzuki Motor Company instantly labored with us to rectify our place and future product,” Suzuki’s native boss added.

After launching in June 2024, the fourth-generation Suzuki Swift initially scored a disappointing one-star ANCAP security score, with bodily crash testing revealing stark discrepancies in crash efficiency between the Australian- and New Zealand-delivered mannequin versus the three-star rated automobile bought in Europe.

Key points had been famous within the frontal offset and full-width crash checks, with the native security authority discovering “larger chest masses and leg damage threat (extreme pedal motion) to the driving force within the frontal offset check, and a considerably better rear passenger chest compression measurement recorded within the full-width check which exceeded allowable limits”.