EXPERT PERSPECTIVE — A few week earlier than being interviewed by Richard Bruce Cheney about whether or not I’d be the appropriate individual to function his nationwide safety briefer, I broke a bone in my left foot. Whereas bounding down the steps at house in a rush to not be late to a gathering on the Nationwide Safety Council, I missed a step. So, somewhat than spending the morning at The White Home, I spent it at a health care provider’s workplace getting an enormous, goofy, purple forged on my left leg. Implausible. How higher to exude to the Vice President of the US that I’d be competent as his President’s Each day Transient (PDB) briefer, than hobbling into the interview with a forged? One way or the other, I acquired the job.
In the course of the presidency of George W. Bush, the President and Vice President’s PDB briefers met and traveled with them six days per week, generally seven. We might awaken each morning round 1:00am to organize what is called the “E-book” and accompanying materials. The E-book was the President’s Each day Transient itself, a brutally concise, comparatively quick assortment of intelligence analyses produced at the moment, by simply the CIA; it went to a brief checklist of designated policymakers. All who acquired it additionally acquired morning briefers to accompany and increase on the content material as wanted and to take taskings, however solely these for the President and Vice President routinely traveled with them. Along with the PDB, there was “behind-the-tab” materials for all recipients besides the President. In Cheney’s case, I made a decision—with zero supervision or coordination—what he additionally wanted to see, per my judgement. Uncooked intel, press items, guide summaries, graphics, and anything that I assumed could possibly be helpful.
I usually briefed the then-Vice President on the Naval Observatory, the official residence for U.S. vice presidents. However only a week into the job, I accompanied him on Marine Two to Camp David, the place he would attend some conferences. Thus started a fast, day by day studying curve into who this man was – beginning with how he handled others.
“Others” fell usually into two classes with little grey space between—these he revered and people he didn’t. Individuals in each classes normally knew the place they stood, and Cheney didn’t manifest completely different orientations towards folks primarily based on their societal stations in life. This was a person whose default setting was to point out courtesy and respect towards others until they satisfied him in any other case. Each one among his ushers, central members of the residence employees, instructed me individually – with zero nudging from me – that they preferred the Cheneys far more than they preferred their predecessors. Why, I requested. As a result of the Cheneys all the time confirmed respect to them, their time calls for, they instructed me. As for these within the different class? Many people recall Cheney telling Senator Patrick Leahy to “go f*** your self” on the Senate ground in 2004. He additionally bluntly expressed his opinions on a variety of actors and even nations to me throughout our time collectively. Few if any fell into grey space.
Nominations for excellent leaders in nationwide safety and intelligence at the moment are open for the 2026 Cipher Transient Honors Dinner. Discover out extra right here.
Cheney constantly hosted the longest of the PDB periods throughout all PDB recipients of that Administration, a mirrored image of his mental curiosity, the countless stacks of books and different issues he learn, his a few years of navigating the U.S. Authorities and geopolitics, and the truth that on most mornings, he went from his briefings with me to attending PDB periods along with his boss. I all the time had not less than half-hour with him, and on mornings when occasions or journey altered the President’s schedule, my periods might stretch past 90 minutes.
One thing that was mirrored in his time dedication to these PDB periods was that, amongst being many issues, Dick Cheney was an overachiever of the world-class order. No matter job, responsibility, mission, strategic pursuit that could be in his cross hairs, he can be completely ready. This a part of him after all helped land his stint because the youngest White Home Chief of Workers in historical past, beneath President Gerald Ford.
A lot has been written about Cheney’s function and actions within the instant wake of 11th of September; I got here after, in the course of the run as much as and penalties following America’s second invasion of Iraq. Due to once I briefed him and the job I took instantly afterward in July 2003 – Chief of CIA’s Iraq enterprise protecting navy, political, management, and financial evaluation – I draw from a singular mixture of views to supply context on the Iraq, Dick Cheney story. Some can be stunned by what I noticed together with throughout NSC conferences chaired by President Bush and attended by Cheney once I sat in because the ‘plus-one’ for the CIA Director or for the Director of Nationwide Intelligence.
On March 16, 2002, Dick Cheney stated on NBC’s Meet the Press, “I feel issues have gotten so dangerous inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi folks, my perception is we are going to, in truth, be greeted as liberators . . . I feel it [the invasion] will go comparatively shortly . . . weeks somewhat than months.” As we now know, he – and different seniors within the Bush Administration – couldn’t have been extra flawed.
Not lengthy after we invaded Iraq in March of 2003, violence there started to swell up, and shortly thereafter the CIA enterprise I headed gave President Bush and Cheney – their first and extremely unwelcome dose of the “I” phrase: insurgency. Early on, Bush and different Administration seniors defined the sources of the violence as “criminals, regime dead-enders, or trouble-makers” pushed into the nation by Iraq and Syria as operatives. However in the summertime of 2003, we put a PDB into the Oval Workplace arguing that an organized and indigenous insurgency was shortly creating. Suggestions from Bush’s PDB briefer that morning was “The President was so offended he got here off his chair. He needs a memo tomorrow morning recounting once we warned him this was coming.” Quite a bit folks labored in a single day to supply that 4.5-page piece, which delivered what was requested.
Sooner or later between that preliminary shock and late summer time, fall of 2003, Cheney – whom we had briefed in additional element on the insurgency, instructed us “The President wants to listen to this.” Think about that one of many Administration’s most vocal and influential advocates of invading Iraq, who had been on report saying the hassle can be straightforward and quick, had now turned to persuading Bush and his whole NSC that we confronted an insurgency in Iraq. Cheney knew that this data, as soon as it entered the general public area, would seemingly get himself in addition to President Bush eviscerated by the media and by critics. However that appeared to matter little to him; the US was underestimating what it was now dealing with in Iraq, and Cheney’s focus grew to become aligning coverage with actuality.
The Cipher Transient brings expert-level context to nationwide and international safety tales. It’s by no means been extra vital to grasp what’s taking place on the earth. Improve your entry to unique content material by changing into a subscriber.
A number of days earlier than Veterans Day in 2003, somebody within the CIA Director’s workplace instructed me there can be a briefing that day for Bush’s NSC on Iraq that I’d lead. Cheney had facilitated this. I additionally was instructed I might take one analyst of my selection, however I knew some on the NSC would push again exhausting and would anticipate “within the weeds” particulars of our evaluation, so I subbed myself out and despatched two senior analysts who knew the weeds – a superlative navy skilled and a political-analyst counterpart.
It was a PhD and former Marine CIA navy analyst in my Iraq enterprise who compelled then Secretary of Protection Don Rumsfeld and others to just accept that an insurgency was rising in Iraq. The analyst’s most persuasive second got here when Rumsfeld argued forcefully that there have been a number of and differing definitions of insurgency, making use of the phrase complicated at finest and inaccurate at worst. That navy analyst calmly however firmly summarized the 2 most generally accepted definitions and illustrated that the CIA’s conclusion was primarily based on the one noticed by Rumsfeld’s Division of Protection. The analyst additionally laid out premises wanted to justify that definition, all of which all within the room had been seeing. Bush declared acceptance, famous that NSC members needed to be sq. with this actuality amongst themselves, and requested all to keep away from the phrase insurgency in public.
Let me shut with an perception that sheds gentle on Cheney’s close to obsession with going into Iraq to search out WMD after which exhibiting a degree of consolation with enhanced interrogation strategies that many discover appalling.
One morning after a PDB briefing with me, Cheney sat again and recounted some historical past following the Gulf Conflict, throughout which he was Secretary of Protection. He jogged my memory with some power that in interrogations of Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law Hussein Kamel, who defected briefly, we realized that Iraq’s nuclear-weapons program was additional alongside than we had assessed. Fairly than a type of scolding for off-the-mark CIA evaluation again then, this angle he was sharing signaled an acknowledgement that I knew the burden of his function in persuading Bush ’43 to invade Iraq—and in his thoughts, he had good motive. If we had been underestimating Saddam’s WMD program once more and Osama bin Laden gained entry to any a part of it, the results for Individuals can be catastrophic.
The Economist Journal lately summarized the unwavering sense of responsibility to nation felt by Cheney. Within the closing phrases of its obituary in reference to criticism about his posture towards countering terrorism, and on being flawed about WMD in Iraq, The Economist wrote: “He was unmoved . . . He was, as all the time, simply doing his job. Attempting to guard America.”
All statements of truth, opinion, or evaluation expressed are these of the creator and don’t replicate the official positions or views of the US Authorities. Nothing within the contents ought to be construed as asserting or implying US Authorities authentication of knowledge or endorsement of the creator’s views.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
