What began off greater than 5 years in the past as one-off bans in particular person school rooms grew into statewide efforts to curb pupil cellphone use throughout college. Now, the thought of limiting youngsters’s tech use has arrived on the Capitol steps in Washington, D.C., the place bipartisan efforts are reaching even additional by contemplating plans to finally ban youngsters beneath 13 from utilizing social media in any respect.
The proposed laws comes at a time when know-how is being pushed more durable than ever, each by tech firms and by the White Home.
And it raises questions on whether or not and the way lawmakers, educators and oldsters ought to draw distinctions concerning the varied methods youngsters use screens — for studying, for socializing and for leisure.
The newest was a joint effort by Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii. In a Jan. 15 listening session dubbed “Plugged Out: Inspecting the Affect of Know-how on America’s Youth,” a panel of 4 specialists spoke on the potential damages of display screen time. The listening to coated a large swath of floor, from AI-enabled toys, to the shuttered e-Charges program and the perfect age minimal to maintain younger youngsters off social media.
“It’s extremely arduous to be a child proper now; all of the dad and mom I do know, myself included, are deeply involved about on a regular basis youngsters spend glued to screens, watching and studying insidious content material that places their minds and their our bodies in danger,” Cruz mentioned within the listening to. “Dad and mom are preventing a continuing battle to maintain their youngsters secure in a quickly evolving digital world.”
Conflicting Federal Efforts?
Federal curiosity in regulating youngsters’s use of know-how is choosing up steam. In June 2025, the Home Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Training held a listening to inspecting college insurance policies banning cellphones. In early December, the Home Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Commerce held a listening to titled “Legislative Options to Shield Youngsters and Teenagers On-line,” targeted on points round privateness and security raised by greater than a dozen payments. Later that month, the Nationwide Telecommunications and Info Administration held a listening session on “the drivers and penalties of extreme display screen use in colleges.”
“I feel we have been conscious we needed to monitor cellphone utilization, however due to the pandemic, everybody was pushing youngsters in entrance of those tech automobiles and now we don’t know easy methods to take them away,” says Annette Anderson, deputy director of the Johns Hopkins’ Heart for Secure and Wholesome Faculties. “There has in all probability been a job to contemplate the federal piece of it for some time.”
The mid-January listening to known as by Cruz by way of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation didn’t have any authorized weight, but it surely dovetailed with the proposed Children Off Social Media Act from Cruz and Schatz. If handed, the act would ban youngsters beneath 13 from social media websites and prohibit social media websites from recommending algorithm-based content material to youngsters beneath 17. And it will require colleges to work “in good religion” to restrict entry to social media websites on their very own networks. The invoice has superior to be up for a Senate vote. It was final up for dialogue in 2024.
“It is an actual battle to maintain your child offline whenever you’re instructed that, ‘All my pals are on Instagram or TikTok,’’” Cruz mentioned. “It is extremely arduous to be the one dad or mum who will not let your child have a cellphone or social media accounts. So, [this bill] says, ‘We will maintain Large Tech accountable to their phrases of service.’”
The push comes as the manager department presses for extra synthetic intelligence within the classroom, with President Trump’s “Advancing Synthetic Intelligence Training for American Youth” government order.
The order known as for the creation of a process drive, which was charged with establishing public-private partnerships to develop on-line sources that will assist lecturers and college students with AI literacy and utilization.
Brian Jacob, the co-director of College of Michigan’s Youth Coverage Lab, believes the 2 initiatives can co-exist, as they tackle two separate concepts. One expresses enthusiasm for making use of AI for academic functions, whereas the opposite facilities worry of display screen time spent on non-educational makes use of, like watching social media movies.
“There’s a little bit of an odd nature of these items occurring on the identical time,” he says. “I feel you possibly can need college students to be off gadgets extra, however once they’re on them, [to be] using AI or having AI be a part of clever tutoring techniques that will higher help college students. I feel in observe you possibly can try to incorporate AI extra into the training area whereas nonetheless limiting, having much less, on-line time.”
College-focused organizations leaned into that nuance. In response to Cruz’s listening session, 17 organizations, not all of them tech-related — together with the American Federation of Academics, American Library Affiliation and the Nationwide Training Affiliation — pushed again on rhetoric concerning the risks of know-how. They appealed for continued federal assist for academic know-how and funding, and pointed towards edtech’s useful position within the classroom.
“As a result of know-how is now integral to the environments by which college students dwell and be taught, a college’s focus should be on intentional implementation slightly than assumptions about ‘extra’ or ‘much less’ know-how,” the organizations wrote in an open letter to Cruz previous to the listening to. “Efficient studying is dependent upon deciding on the appropriate instruments to assist particular educational objectives. Fragmented or inconsistent implementation — not know-how itself — is what overwhelms lecturers and households.”
The organizations argued that “‘display screen time’ will not be a single class and shouldn’t be evaluated as such,” including that know-how used within the classroom, that’s “aligned to curriculum, guided by educators, and ruled by regionally developed college district privateness and safety insurance policies,” is “essentially completely different” than college students utilizing gadgets for leisure functions.
“It’s important to differentiate between largely unsupervised, entertainment-driven know-how use at residence and the intentional, monitored, and thoroughly curated use of know-how in colleges — the place digital instruments are employed to assist studying and put together college students for future tutorial and workforce calls for,” the letter says.
State Efforts Set the Basis
The federal efforts, whereas new, construct on laws over the previous couple of years from a number of states. As of final fall, greater than half of the nation’s states have adopted a cellphone ban in colleges, with most mandating that telephones can’t be used throughout educational time.
The efforts initially started college by college, resembling the 2019 rule at California’s San Mateo Excessive College that each one 1,700 college students place their telephones in pouches. The primary statewide effort occurred in Florida in 2023, which initially allowed college students to make use of their telephones between passing intervals and at lunch, however banned them within the classroom except explicitly allowed for a lesson. It additionally banned social media apps on college computer systems and Wi-Fi networks.
Supply: Shutterstock/ChameleonsEye
As of late January, solely 5 states do not need any statewide insurance policies, with the bulk having some form of ban or restriction of cellphones within the classroom.
Cellphone bans characterize a uncommon flashpoint of bipartisan settlement.
“Youngsters’s security on-line will not be a partisan concern,” Sen. Maria Cantwell, Democrat of Washington, mentioned throughout the Senate listening to. “Each dad or mum, trainer, lawmaker, desires the identical issues. We would like youngsters who’re secure, wholesome and in a position to thrive … However within the absence of federal laws, states and governments have stepped up.”
States have begun amping up restrictions, with some eyeing “bell-to-bell” legal guidelines that ban telephones from the beginning of the college day by way of the top, together with passing intervals and lunch time. Florida amended its 2023 invoice in 2025 to the bell-to-bell language. A number of others, together with Indiana and Kansas, are contemplating beefing up their restrictions.
However some dissenters recommend that it ought to be a school-by-school concern.
“States and legislators actually are involved, however I feel it’s a problem whenever you’re making state laws [to weigh] how a lot do you wish to mandate selections,” says Jacob on the College of Michigan’s Youth Coverage Lab. “Do you wish to make each district do the very same coverage? I can see arguments for leaving it as much as native leaders.”
The open letter by the college associations additionally pushed for extra native management, as a substitute of federal management.
“Selections about training gadgets, classroom know-how, and native screen-use practices ought to stay within the arms of native educators and their households who finest perceive their very own college students’ wants,” the letter acknowledged.
Lack of Consistency in Faculties
Some states adhere to restrictions greater than others. In response to the newly launched “Cellphone-Free Faculties State Report Card,” 17 states acquired a “B” for his or her bell-to-bell insurance policies, getting decrease marks for permitting cellphones in accessible locations or not explicitly stating the place telephones ought to be saved.
Each Jacob, and Anderson of Johns Hopkins, are involved concerning the lack of express, constant tips in colleges.
“Everybody sees a necessity for some sort of limitation; what’s sort of loopy, and it’s the identical with the synthetic intelligence push, is it doesn’t look the identical,” Anderson says. “It’s completely different from college to high school, classroom to classroom, district to district. The dearth of consistency makes it tough to indicate the impact these bans have.”
Jacob worries the rules will place the burden on lecturers.
“I worry numerous colleges will ban them however say ‘Children should maintain them of their pockets and lecturers should police that,’ and that method will probably be actually robust to implement in any means,” he says, including it’s best to mandate maintaining them in lockers or a centralized location.
Many on the federal degree consider full cellphone bans in colleges are key to fixing extreme display screen time. Nonetheless, Anderson — who testified earlier than the D.C. State Board of Training about telephones’ results on youngsters — believes officers ought to be trying on the greater image.
“I really feel like we’re placing a Band-Help on the ocean,” she says. “I feel folks in colleges really feel they’ll management the hours of 8:30 to 2:30, however there additionally must be extra conversations on what can occur outdoors of faculty — and managing that.”
